In ABC Inc., seven directors T,U,V,W,X,Y,Z; notices for a special meeting were sent to all except Z because there is no record of her address. The meeting was attended by five directors and all motions passed. Which statement is true?

• A. Only I
• B. All
• C. Only II
• D. None

Answer: (A)

The situation centers on quorum and how notice affects board actions. With seven directors, a majority (four) is enough to form a quorum. Five directors attended, so the meeting had a valid quorum, meaning the group could legally deliberate and approve motions.

For a special meeting, notice typically should go to all directors. But missing notice to one director because there’s no address does not automatically invalidate the meeting or its decisions if a quorum is present and no one objects. The motions passed by those five directors are generally valid under these circumstances.

So the true point is that there was a quorum, allowing the motions to be valid, while the absence of notice to a director does not by itself nullify the meeting. That’s why only the first statement holds true.