Which indorsement type may render a negotiable instrument non-negotiable?

Study for the Supernova Regulatory Framework for Business Transactions Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question has hints and explanations. Get prepared for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which indorsement type may render a negotiable instrument non-negotiable?

Explanation:
Restrictive indorsement changes how the instrument can be used or transferred. When the indorser writes terms that limit the instrument’s future negotiation—for example, “for deposit only” or “for collection”—the holder’s rights to freely transfer the instrument to anyone else are restricted. Negotiable instruments must be freely transferable and payable to order or bearer without extra conditions or limitations. By attaching a restriction, the instrument no longer meets that standard, so it can become non-negotiable for subsequent holders. Other indorsements mainly affect who bears liability (qualified/without recourse) or add a condition, but they don’t inherently impose the broad transfer restrictions that destroy negotiability.

Restrictive indorsement changes how the instrument can be used or transferred. When the indorser writes terms that limit the instrument’s future negotiation—for example, “for deposit only” or “for collection”—the holder’s rights to freely transfer the instrument to anyone else are restricted. Negotiable instruments must be freely transferable and payable to order or bearer without extra conditions or limitations. By attaching a restriction, the instrument no longer meets that standard, so it can become non-negotiable for subsequent holders.

Other indorsements mainly affect who bears liability (qualified/without recourse) or add a condition, but they don’t inherently impose the broad transfer restrictions that destroy negotiability.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy